Aeration and Fountain Manufacturers Association
Aeration and Fountain Manufacturers Association

Standardized Testing | Safety | Pumping Rates | Pumping Rate Methods
Evacuation Methods
| Evacuation Test Form | Transfer Methods | Evacuation Method Results | Test Photos

 

Study To Establish A Pumping Rate Standard Method

 

Fountain Industry

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to establish a simple, economic, year around method to certify the pumping rate of various fountain designs. Pumping rate is important in the application of fountains not only for their beauty but also for performing other functions such as aeration and mixing of ponds.

The present study considered several pumping measurement methods. The selection process considered the following criteria.

1. Accuracy

+/- 5%
2. Capacity 0 to 1000 GPM
3. Cost <$10,000.00
4. Simplicity Total test period in and out <2 hours
5. Water reuse No discharge
6. Year round usage Indoors
7. Space required 20' x 20'
8. Humidity control Minimum spray
9. Test time Min. 30 min. Max 60 min.
10. Low technology Recording flow and KW meters

Methods:

Two methods were selected for testing.

Method A was used as the base to determine the unrestricted pumpage rate. The deflector pipe was used to avoid any possible water falling back into the discharge test tank. This method is not recommended for general usage because of uncontrolled humidity and spray.

Method B is recommended for general usage because of the following:

A. No spray
B. Minimum humidity problem
C. Minimum space requirements
D. Minimum water usage
E. Minimum tankage
F. Year around use

Test Series #2 - Comparing Method A with Method B

Method A - Regular Geyser

Average of the three tests - KW - 2.23 GPM - 110 GPM/KW - 49.3

Method B - Regular Geyser

Average of the three tests- KW - 2.21 GPM - 105 GPM/KW - 47.5

Adjustment Factor

Method B (49.3/47.5)* = Method A

* correction factor 1.038

Conclusions:

Based on the above analysis, the following is concluded.

  1. Method A - unrestricted discharge flow is considered the most accurate method.
  2. Method A requires a large basin since the spray is not controlled.
  3. Method A is limited to outdoor use due to humidity.
  4. Method A is limited by climate conditions (i.e. winter).
  5. Method B is less accurate but an appropriate adjustment can be made to correct for slightly restricted discharge flow conditions.
  6. Method B meets all of the other pertinent criteria and is therefore recommended as the standard test procedures for determining the pumpage rate of fountains.

Certification:

This study was conducted and certified by GSEE Inc. Gerry Shell P.E. President

 

Home | Association Mission Statement | Membership-Contacts | Events | Tests | Contact Us | Site Map
©2006 Aeration and Fountain Manufacturers Association

Home Association Mission Statement Members-Contacts Upcoming Events Tests Contact Us Site Map